Matt has the ability to to create experiences that at first glance may seem unexceptional, but which stay with you and lead to explorations of underlying meanings and questions about the nature of creative initiatives. In a sense he doesn't set out to create art, but uses art to create a perturbation in the viewers environment. His work is wide ranging, although 'sculptoral' and 'performance' are words I would attach to his oeuvre.
![]() |
| Viewpoint. Sculpture on the Gulf 2013. Matt Akehurst |
In Viewpoint we are presented viewing platforms that predetermine what we see. The implications of this raise wide ranging considerations of how our views of the world are shaped and constrained - often unconsciously - by external factors.
One of the perennial discussions in art meanders around the question intent. Does the artist have an intention in mind when creating a work? Then -do we need to be aware of it when we look at the work? Matt's work, it seems to me, is falls at the 'awareness is not needed' end of the spectrum. Indeed he does not self identify his work as objects of art - that is for the viewer, the audience, whose interactions are necessary before any such identification. In one performance creative work Matt wandered around Christchurch in a closely planned circuit dressed in a chicken suit ('Chicken man'). He reacted passively to interactions with the public, and garnered some quite bizarre responses.
Identifying a creative product as a work of art preconditions audience perceptions, an outcome that Matt tries to pervert. He has been instrumental in fanning my enthusiasm and appreciation for contemporary art, and artists. Matt is one of those whose creative inspirations advance the dialogue about the nature of art - dialogue that is necessary, tantalising, and endless.






















